This study aims to document how action planning (AcP) and coping planning (CP)
(Gollwitzer, 1999) combines with the intention and perceived behavioral control (PBC) variables
(Ajzen, 1991) to predict physical activity (PA) behavior. It was hypothesized that: 1) intention and
the use of planning would each have a main effect on PA behavior, 2) AcP, with or without CP,
would be useful to individuals with low PBC if their intention was high. In a quasi-experimental
prospective design, 122 individuals were asked to engage regularly in PA for the 5 following weeks
with the help of AcP alone, AcP and CP, or no planning at all. TPB variables and past month PA
behavior were measured at T1 and frequency of PA was measured at T2. Results of an ANCOVA 2
(low vs high intention) X 3 (no planning, AcP, AcP + CP) X 3 (low, average or high PBC), which
controlled for the infl uence of past behavior, revealed a main effect of intention and a signifi cant
interaction between intention, planning and PBC. Simple effects analysis demonstrated that AcP
alone improved PA frequency among low PBC individuals with high intention. Limits of the design
as well as conceptual implications are discussed.