The Lives of Flamininus and Aemilius Paullus are good examples of Plutarch’s tendency to judge his
Roman heroes according to their Hellenic qualities and benefactions to Greeks. While modern
scholars rightly stress that both politicians were mainly driven by Roman interests and personal
ambition, the biographer chooses primarily to highlight their philanthropic nature as well as
their favourable attitude to Greek liberty and culture. Conspicuously, his praise is particularly
generous in two episodes related to feasts and spectacles. Following the proclamation of liberty
at the Isthmian Games, Flamininus’ policies are celebrated in the course of a banquet, with his
achievements being judged equal or superior to those of the most eminent Greek statesmen of
the past (Flam. 11). In the Aemilius, it is the protagonist himself who organises splendid feasts
in a way that inspires profound admiration on the part of the Greeks (Aem. 28). While Livy’s
account suggests that the victory celebrations at Amphipolis should primarily be seen as a show
of Roman power, Plutarch essentially describes the event as a pleasant entertainment with a
view to revealing Aemilius’ personal qualities. Greek-style festivals and banquets thus provide a
most suitable background for presenting the ‘liberators’ of Greece as exemplars of philhellenism
and philanthrôpia.